Sunday, July 31, 2011
An Important Personal Reason why Cannabis should be Legalized
x22422Amaj9EEE002455A5D9D9DEBmBm]BmB9B9
i'm in love, i'm in love, i'm in love, i'm in love.
i'm in love, i'm in love, i'm in love, i'm in love.
Labels: drug war, marijuana, superhero erotica, universal health care
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Solar Power is Fastest Growing Industry in US
There is are a couple of unfortunate wrinkles in what would otherwise be true:
If you don't have money, it scarcely matters what the price of goods is. You are still fucked. For virtually everybody this impecunious, having money = having a job, not selling some bonds or re-allocating your portfolio in the direction of a higher-dividend asset assortment. Given the er... not exactly small... number of people who have fallen off this particular bus(with the additional fun that periods of joblessness do wonders for one's future prospects of being re-hired...) "jobs" as something close to an end in itself does represent a net gain for a substantial number of people.
Secondly, you say that "Ideally you would want a world where you have unlimited energy that required no money (ie jobs). This is true If and Only If the gains from increased efficiency are allocated in a manner that gives you a slice of the expanding pie. If, however, the pie is expanding; but your share of it is shrinking even faster(because whatever you do is an "inefficiency", you are quickly sliding toward point #1.
Empirically, a great many people have reason to be concerned, and to have no particular room to hope that even steady encheapening of goods will allow them to do better than tread water, since labor is definitely one of the goods being encheapened. As this [investorvillage.com] cheery little J.P. Morgan report notes, in a discussion of the improvement of corporate margins: "There are a lot of moving parts in the margin equation, but as shown in the second chart, reductions in wages and benefits explain the majority of the net improvement in margins. This trend has continued; as we have shown several times over the last two years, US labor compensation is now at a 50-year low relative to both company sales and US GDP (see EoTM April 26, 2011)."
Improvements in efficiency do you absolutely no good if somebody with more market power than you have is capturing them. This would appear to be the case. Under such conditions, the people with less market power(ie. about the bottom 95%) don't have a rational interest in efficiency; because they won't capture the gains from it. While(from the perspective of people's actual state of knowledge) the fascination with "jobs" might be largely sentimental populism, it is arguably not economically irrational. If essentially all gains from efficiency(which includes reduction in human resources costs) are being captured by people who aren't you, it is very much in your interest to demand greater inefficiency and attempt to roll back the reduction in demand for you.
Only in a society where everybody has a boat is the fact that the 'rising tide lifts all boats' a comforting one. If a substantial portion of the population is stuck in the mud, the rising tide is not a welcome development...
Labels: economics, indifferent corporations, politics, renewable energy, USA
Monday, July 25, 2011
Glen Eden
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Re: Fw: Go Cairo!!!
[hmmmmm..... seems the images are all stripped out. must be how they're embedded or linked in the email. joel does not like this trend.]
Hi Mom,
Thanks for tuning me in to that. I didn't know that the military had that many dogs trained for war like that. In my opinion, there's nothing laudable about it. And as to the ethics behind it, the premise of their conditional statement is false: "If it's ethical to send humans into combat, then why not dogs?"
In my lifetime, I have yet to see the US get into an ethically-justifiable war, according to my understanding of Christian, or even just human, ethics. If the ethical code is based on empire, then with the principles that guide an empire ethic, yes, send humans, dogs, and sharks with lasers attached to their fins.
In the meantime, we're spending $250,000,000 on dog armor, and I wonder how much on training, etc.
Many blessings,
Joel
http://revjd.blogspot.com/
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes
the existing model obsolete."
-Buckminster Fuller (Architect and Geometrist)
Hi Mom,
Thanks for tuning me in to that. I didn't know that the military had that many dogs trained for war like that. In my opinion, there's nothing laudable about it. And as to the ethics behind it, the premise of their conditional statement is false: "If it's ethical to send humans into combat, then why not dogs?"
In my lifetime, I have yet to see the US get into an ethically-justifiable war, according to my understanding of Christian, or even just human, ethics. If the ethical code is based on empire, then with the principles that guide an empire ethic, yes, send humans, dogs, and sharks with lasers attached to their fins.
In the meantime, we're spending $250,000,000 on dog armor, and I wonder how much on training, etc.
Many blessings,
Joel
http://revjd.blogspot.com/
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes
the existing model obsolete."
-Buckminster Fuller (Architect and Geometrist)
On 13 July 2011 15:17, wrote:
----- Original Message -----
Subject: FW: Go Cairo!!!
Labels: mailbot
Sunday, July 10, 2011
Sinéad O'Connor Update and Quote
long with this 1994 quote "There is no too far," from Lee Renaldo,
I realised songs were a place where you could say anything at all, the stuff you wouldn't dream of saying in real life.
Labels: angry at organized religions, mental health issues, music, nuns, personal bookmarks, tattoos, theological sources
Re: The final push in Oakland
Dear Mary Jane,
I imagine this Janice Hahn may be a good candidate, however I will not be helping Organizing for America now or in 2012.
I am entirely disenfranchised with the right/centrist agenda Barack Obama has been pursuing. His policies have amounted to making "Change We Can Believe In" the saddest hollow promise I've ever heard in my 42 years.
Specifically, his budgetary policies continue to serve the wealthy corporate investors in a fashion similar to George W Bush including offering to trade away social security; he is continuing to invest our military in wars upon wars rather than pursue more peaceable solutions; his administration flip-flops on the drug war, muddying the legal waters while continuing to harass moral and innocent people in medical need, using taxpayer dollars as if they are criminals; and he has done astonishingly little to support renewable energy, compared to subsidies for fossil fuels and nuclear.
Therefore, his name attached to your request does not inspire me to help you unless he truly becomes "The Change I Thought I Was Believing In." Please send him this message--I voted for him in 2008, but he and any Democratic candidates he supports have squandered my good faith, and lost my support for 2012.
,
With peace and real hope,
Joel
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes
the existing model obsolete."
-Buckminster Fuller (Architect and Geometrist)
I imagine this Janice Hahn may be a good candidate, however I will not be helping Organizing for America now or in 2012.
I am entirely disenfranchised with the right/centrist agenda Barack Obama has been pursuing. His policies have amounted to making "Change We Can Believe In" the saddest hollow promise I've ever heard in my 42 years.
Specifically, his budgetary policies continue to serve the wealthy corporate investors in a fashion similar to George W Bush including offering to trade away social security; he is continuing to invest our military in wars upon wars rather than pursue more peaceable solutions; his administration flip-flops on the drug war, muddying the legal waters while continuing to harass moral and innocent people in medical need, using taxpayer dollars as if they are criminals; and he has done astonishingly little to support renewable energy, compared to subsidies for fossil fuels and nuclear.
Therefore, his name attached to your request does not inspire me to help you unless he truly becomes "The Change I Thought I Was Believing In." Please send him this message--I voted for him in 2008, but he and any Democratic candidates he supports have squandered my good faith, and lost my support for 2012.
,
With peace and real hope,
Joel
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes
the existing model obsolete."
-Buckminster Fuller (Architect and Geometrist)
On 9 July 2011 15:09, Mary Jane Stevenson, CA.BarackObama.com <info@barackobama.com> wrote:
Vote for Disappointment Joel --
For the past several weeks, OFA California volunteers have been making calls and knocking on doors to help send Janice Hahn to Congress. And all of that work comes down to this, the final three days.
On Monday and Tuesday, it's all about getting out the vote. Will you join us in Oakland to help with the final push?
Here are the details:
What: Get out the vote for Janice Hahn
Where: 1714 Telegraph Avenue
Oakland, CA 94612
When: Tuesday, July 12th
10:00 am
Janice is the Democratic nominee in the 36th Congressional District's special election. She'll fight to create good jobs, support clean energy, and protect Medicare -- but only if we do our part to help her win.
RSVP to help out in Oakland on Tuesday:
http://my.barackobama.com/Calls-for-Janice-Hahn
Thanks,
Mary Jane
Mary Jane Stevenson
California State Director
Organizing for America
This email was sent to:@gmail.com
Labels: changing the prison paradigm, classism, drug war, peace, politics, renewable energy, USA, war and peace